feat: renames test to quiz, fixes #244

BREAKING CHANGE

* changed test to quiz: fixes issues in #244
* fixed info.toml: #244
* fixed naming related issues

README.md

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ rustlings hint myExercise1
 
 ## Testing yourself
 
-After every couple of sections, there will be a test that'll test your knowledge on a bunch of sections at once. These tests are found in `exercises/testN.rs`.
+After every couple of sections, there will be a quiz that'll test your knowledge on a bunch of sections at once. These quizzes are found in `exercises/quizN.rs`.
 
 ## Completion
 

exercises/quiz1.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-// test1.rs
-// This is a test for the following sections:
+// quiz1.rs
+// This is a quiz for the following sections:
 // - Variables
 // - Functions
 

exercises/quiz2.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-// test2.rs
-// This is a test for the following sections:
+// quiz2.rs
+// This is a quiz for the following sections:
 // - Strings
 
 // Ok, here are a bunch of values-- some are `String`s, some are `&str`s. Your

exercises/quiz3.rs

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-// test3.rs
-// This is a test for the following sections:
+// quiz.rs
+// This is a quiz for the following sections:
 // - Tests
 
-// This test isn't testing our function -- make it do that in such a way that
+// This quiz isn't testing our function -- make it do that in such a way that
 // the test passes. Then write a second test that tests that we get the result
 // we expect to get when we call `times_two` with a negative number.
 // No hints, you can do this :)

exercises/quiz4.rs

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-// test4.rs
-// This test covers the sections:
+// quiz4.rs
+// This quiz covers the sections:
 // - Modules
 // - Macros
 
-// Write a macro that passes the test! No hints this time, you can do it!
+// Write a macro that passes the quiz! No hints this time, you can do it!
 
 // I AM NOT DONE
 

info.toml

@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ They are not the same. There are two solutions:
 # TEST 1
 
 [[exercises]]
-name = "test1"
-path = "exercises/test1.rs"
+name = "quiz1"
+path = "exercises/quiz1.rs"
 mode = "test"
 hint = "No hints this time ;)"
 
@@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ string slice instead of a `String`, wouldn't it?? There is a way to add one char
 # TEST 2
 
 [[exercises]]
-name = "test2"
-path = "exercises/test2.rs"
+name = "quiz2"
+path = "exercises/quiz2.rs"
 mode = "compile"
 hint = "No hints this time ;)"
 
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ hint = "No hints this time ;)"
 # TESTS
 
 [[exercises]]
-name = "tests1"
+name = "quiz1"
 path = "exercises/tests/tests1.rs"
 mode = "test"
 hint = """
@@ -343,8 +343,8 @@ can negate the result of what you're doing using `!`, like `assert!(!having_fun(
 # TEST 3
 
 [[exercises]]
-name = "test3"
-path = "exercises/test3.rs"
+name = "quiz3"
+path = "exercises/quiz3.rs"
 mode = "test"
 hint = "No hints this time ;)"
 
@@ -414,8 +414,8 @@ The way macros are written, it wants to see something between each
 # TEST 4
 
 [[exercises]]
-name = "test4"
-path = "exercises/test4.rs"
+name = "quiz4"
+path = "exercises/quiz4.rs"
 mode = "test"
 hint = "No hints this time ;)"