Compare commits

...

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Eastwood 28a51b6447
Merge fa6680ff76 into dd0634c483 2024-11-14 14:38:45 -03:00
Mo dd0634c483
Merge pull request #2158 from mnshdw/mnshdw/feedback-errors6
errors6: Add alternative solution using From trait
2024-11-14 14:49:57 +01:00
Antoine Dupuis fc0cd8f0f8 Switch comment style to // 2024-11-14 09:14:40 +01:00
Antoine Dupuis d5cae8ff59 Add alternative solution using From trait 2024-11-13 23:51:09 +01:00
mo8it 38016cb2d6 clippy3: Make the intent more clear 2024-11-13 16:06:41 +01:00
Eric Eastwood fa6680ff76 Correctly point to sections 2024-10-16 11:09:09 -05:00
Eric Eastwood 2bccdcbd2c Use simple caution message with expand for more details 2024-10-16 11:07:42 -05:00
Eric Eastwood 60e0d4ae8a Fix some grammar 2024-10-16 11:01:41 -05:00
Eric Eastwood a025ce0538 Add warning about rust-analyzer not working if you clone and use the repo directly
> Yes, you are right, if you just clone the repository and try to edit the exercises, the language server will not work. This is one downside of the current approach. But this only affects developing exercises.
>
> The new method of doing Rustlings is to install Rustlings using `cargo install rustlings` (not published yet), then running `rustlings init`. No repo cloning happens. Instead, the directory `rustlings/` will be created where you find the exercises. The language server works there out of the box :)
>
> I need to add a warning when people try to work on the exercises from the repository. Thanks pointing this out.
>
> -- @mo8it, https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings/issues/1935#issuecomment-2067664066

Other references:

 - Previous `rustlings lsp` command: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings/pull/1026
 - The changelog says "LSP support out of the box", https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#lsp-support-out-of-the-box
2024-10-14 14:11:09 -05:00
4 changed files with 33 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -45,6 +45,18 @@ cargo install rustlings
</details>
> [!CAUTION]
> Don't try to clone the repository to do the exercises! `rust-analyzer` won't work in that case. Please follow the instructions above instead.
>
> <details>
> <summary>Why?</summary>
>
>The intended way to run Rustlings is to install the binary and run `rustlings init` as described in the installation/initialization sections. This generates a `Cargo.toml` (different than what you see in the repository) that includes each exercise as a separate binary target which is enough for `rust-analyzer` to work.
>
>If you just clone the repository and try to run and edit the exercises directly, the language server will not work.
>
> </details>
### Initialization
After installing Rustlings, run the following command to initialize the `rustlings/` directory:

View file

@ -4,9 +4,11 @@
#[rustfmt::skip]
#[allow(unused_variables, unused_assignments)]
fn main() {
let my_option: Option<()> = None;
let my_option: Option<&str> = None;
// Assume that you don't know the value of `my_option`.
// In the case of `Some`, we want to print its value.
if my_option.is_none() {
println!("{:?}", my_option.unwrap());
println!("{}", my_option.unwrap());
}
let my_arr = &[

View file

@ -29,6 +29,21 @@ impl ParsePosNonzeroError {
}
}
// As an alternative solution, implementing the `From` trait allows for the
// automatic conversion from a `ParseIntError` into a `ParsePosNonzeroError`
// using the `?` operator, without the need to call `map_err`.
//
// ```
// let x: i64 = s.parse()?;
// ```
//
// Traits like `From` will be dealt with in later exercises.
impl From<ParseIntError> for ParsePosNonzeroError {
fn from(err: ParseIntError) -> Self {
ParsePosNonzeroError::ParseInt(err)
}
}
#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
struct PositiveNonzeroInteger(u64);

View file

@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ use std::mem;
#[rustfmt::skip]
#[allow(unused_variables, unused_assignments)]
fn main() {
let my_option: Option<()> = None;
let my_option: Option<&str> = None;
// `unwrap` of an `Option` after checking if it is `None` will panic.
// Use `if-let` instead.
if let Some(value) = my_option {
println!("{value:?}");
println!("{value}");
}
// A comma was missing.